Six Domains. One Intelligent Foundation.
SEBI's Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework supersedes all of SEBI's earlier cybersecurity circulars, replacing a patchwork of sector-specific advisories with a single standard for every regulated entity in the Indian securities market. Entities already covered by earlier cybersecurity guidelines had to comply from 1 January 2025; entities adopting CSCRF for the first time had until 1 April 2025.
The framework is broader than a typical audit checklist. It draws on ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, and CIS v8, and folds in governance, supply-chain risk, data classification and localisation, API security, and SOC monitoring under one structure. It also asks REs to plan now for "harvest now, decrypt later" risk from quantum computing, a detail worth noting since it's one of the few compliance frameworks that names quantum threat modelling directly.
TeamSync doesn't file your cyber audit for you. But the underlying controls CSCRF is built around- access control, encryption, audit logging, retention, and quantum-resistant security at the storage layer, are the same things the platform already handles.
What CSCRF Requires
Who Counts As A "Qualified RE"
CSCRF applies different depths of obligation depending on entity type and scale. It covers a wide range of SEBI-regulated entities, stock exchanges, depositories, clearing corporations, stock brokers, depository participants, AMCs, RTAs, and KRAs among them. MIIs (exchanges, depositories, clearing corporations) and entities designated "Qualified REs" carry the heaviest requirements: ISO 27001, CCI reporting, and red teaming. Smaller REs still need the governance, VAPT, and SOC baseline, just without the top tier of obligations.
Penalty Exposure
SEBI doesn't have a single CSCRF-specific penalty clause; non-compliance is enforced through the general penalty provisions of the SEBI Act, 1992, so the exposure depends on which regulation or direction the failure sits under.
Beyond monetary penalties, non-compliance can trigger other regulatory action — which in practice includes operational restrictions and increased supervisory scrutiny, independent of any fine.
Flag for legal: this table intentionally shows a range across different SEBI Act sections rather than one CSCRF-specific figure, worth confirming with your compliance reviewer which provision is most relevant to lead with for your audience (MIIs vs. brokers vs. AMCs will map to different sections).
Compliance Deadlines
Milestone | Date |
CSCRF formulated | |
Entities under prior cybersecurity guidelines | |
First-time CSCRF adopters | |
Ongoing | Cyber audit reports submitted in structured formats per CSCRF timelines |
What Else Runs On The Same Platform
Capability | What it does inside the CSCRF perimeter |
RBAC | Access-control layer supporting the governance and audit requirements |
Compliance Audit Trail | Cryptographic audit chain, supports log retention and cyber audit evidence |
Security and Deployment | Air-gapped, quantum-secure encryption, a direct answer to CSCRF's quantum-risk guidance |
Risk Radar | Flags documents or data patterns that need closer security review |
Agentic Workflow | Automates incident logging and escalation steps ahead of SEBI portal reporting |
Intelligent Repository | Central store with retention and classification rules applied at the platform level |
DocuTalk | Permission-aware AI search, never surfaces data a user isn't entitled to see |
What A Cyber Audit Looks Like
Audit request | What you'd need to produce |
"Show us your VAPT reports for this cycle" | Structured VAPT report in CSCRF format |
"Show us your access logs for this system" | Audit trail with cryptographic chain of custody |
"Show us your incident reporting timeline" | Timestamped incident log |
"Show us your data classification and localisation controls" | Classification rules and storage-location evidence |
"Show us your CCI score" (Qualified REs / MIIs) | Generated CCI assessment artifact |
What Changes For Compliance And Security Teams
Activity | Before | With TeamSync |
Cyber audit evidence assembly | Manual document pull across systems | Generated artifact from the audit chain |
Access control documentation | Policy PDF | Live RBAC configuration + audit trail |
Data classification for localisation | Manual tagging | AI-assisted metadata and tagging |
Incident log retrieval | Ad hoc | Timestamped, queryable log |
Quantum-readiness question in an audit | Open engineering question | Architectural answer |
How TeamSync Compares
Legacy GRC platforms: Strong policy and audit-workflow tooling, but the documents and data CSCRF is protecting still need to be found and secured in a separate repository
Point VAPT/SOC vendors: Strong on the security-testing and monitoring layer, narrower on where the underlying data actually lives
In-house SOC + spreadsheets: Most flexible on paper, but CCI tracking, log retention, and audit evidence assembly are left entirely to the team