Grounded Summaries , Cited To The Source

Accuracy is not the right test on its own - verifiability is. Every point in a TeamSync summary links to the passage it came from, so a reviewer confirms each claim against the source in one click rather than accepting the output at face value.

Long documents are processed in sections and then synthesised with structure preserved, and every point carries a citation, so a reviewer can see which clauses the summary drew on and check the ones it did not.

Summaries are generated only from documents the requesting user is permitted to read, so there is no cross-permission bleed, and the whole pipeline can run inside your own environment including air-gapped deployments.

Extractive tools lift sentences verbatim and lose the connective reasoning. Generative summarisation restates across the whole document and across multiple documents at once - which is only safe when every restatement is traceable to a source, as it is here.

Yes. Select a folder, a matter or a search result set and the output is a single synthesis across every file, with per-source attribution showing which document each finding came from.