use case — compliance regime shift.
The pattern is consistent: a new compliance regime lands on the existing document estate. DORA in 2025, EU AI Act high-risk Annex III obligations in 2026, NARA M-23-07 federal records modernisation, the FDA Security Rule NPRM tightening, MAS Veritas, FCA AI guidance, the next regime that has not yet been announced. The platform that absorbs each as configuration — not project — is the platform that survives the next decade.
Talk to a solutions engineer · Read the CCO page
team profile.
| Dimension | Profile |
|---|---|
| Trigger | New regulation announced; effective-date pressure; board / regulator inquiry |
| Buying centre | CCO + CISO + CIO + GC |
| Vertical | Any with affected regulator |
| Decision timeline | Aligned to effective date; often 6-12 months ahead |
TeamSync's answer.
Compliance overlays as configuration.
The overlay catalogue treats each regime as a configuration extension; new regimes activate without re-platforming.
Per-overlay evidence pack.
Each regulator gets the evidence pack pre-formatted to that regulator's expected format.
Continuous evidence vs project assembly.
Evidence accumulates continuously through normal operations; assembly is a query.
Cross-overlay control reuse.
Where overlays share controls (e.g., audit-log integrity across DORA + SOX + ISO 27001), the underlying evidence is reused; cost-of-overlay is incremental.
CTAs.
| Role | Action |
|---|---|
| CCO with new regime on the calendar | Talk to a solutions engineer |
| CISO + Audit Committee | Read the CISO + Audit Committee page |